Language, Culture, and Mentality: The Three-Dimensional Axis of Language Studies and Effective Communication

Samson Dodzi Fenuku
Abstract

he field of language studies has increasingly acknowledged the integral roles of cultural competence and mentality in shaping language learning outcomes. However, an examination of the literature reveals that the influence of language, culture, and mentality on language studies and effective communication is not adequately researched. Through the sociocultural theoretical lens, interview responses, and interpretive qualitative thematic analysis, this study researched three underpinning research questions. The findings reveal that cultural scaffolding, characterized by the integration of cultural narratives and practices into language teaching, significantly enhances learning by making it relevant and engaging. On the influence of mentality on language learning, attitudes, beliefs, and the educational environment’s cultural attitudes shape learners’ motivation and engagement. An adaptive mentality, marked by openness and respect for cultural diversity, emerges as crucial for navigating communication barriers, especially in multicultural corporate settings. The analysis further demonstrates that effective communication in such environments requires more than linguistic competence; it demands an understanding of cultural nuances and the flexibility to adapt communication styles accordingly. Language serves as a cultural mediator, facilitating not only the exchange of information but also cultural empathy and understanding.

Keywords
Linguistic comprehension, qualitative approach, Zone of Proximal Development, cross-cultural communication, and sociocultural theory
References
  • A.M., S., O.F., A., A.A., A., & I.O., A. (2023). Effective communication: A stimulant to employees’ performance in an organization. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics, 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.52589/ijlll-3k66o99i
  • Akilandeswari, V., Dinesh Kumar, A., Pavithra, M., Mariyam, A. T., Nasreen Banu, J., & Srinivasan, D. (2015). Elements of effective communication. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education (IJMRME), ISSN: Vol. I. http://www.rdmodernresearch.org
  • Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2020). Handbook of cultural intelligence. Routledge.
  • Antoniou, M., & Bak, T. H. (2019). The impact of bilingualism on executive functions in children and adults: The role of language proficiency. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 36(5-6), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1634828
  • Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., Montero-Melis, G., Damjanovic, L., Schartner, A., Kibbe, A., Riches, N., & Thierry, G. (2015). Two languages, two minds: Flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psychological Science, 26(4), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567509
  • Athanasopoulos, P., Casasanto, D., et al. (2015). Language and thought in action: A new look at the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 30(4), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2014.959421
  • Bak, T. H. (2020). The benefits of multilingualism to the personal and professional development of residents of the US. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01428
  • Boroditsky, L., & Gaby, A. (2018). Remembrances of times East: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian Aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1449-1456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618779974
  • Bouajjar, A. (2023). Linguistic imperialism: Means, impacts and means of resistance. Retrieved from http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index Byram, M. (2017). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited. Multilingual Matters.
  • Casasanto, D. (2016). Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 66(3), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12174
  • Danziger, E. (2011). Distinguishing three-dimensional forms from their mirror-images: Whorfian results from users of intrinsic frames of linguistic reference. Language Sciences, 33(6), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.008
  • Filippi, R., Morris, S., Richardson, D. F., et al. (2020). The role of social interaction in language learning. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 55, 102874.
  • Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2021). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognition, 129(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.015
  • Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1305–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01193.x
  • Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  • Gelfand, M. J., Varnum, M. E. W., et al. (2018). The rule of culture: Cultural tightness-looseness and social norms. Psychological Science, 29(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617721272
  • Gürbüz, A., Abi, M., & Canlı, B. (2023). Students’ perceived cultural styles, second language communication, and confidence in communication. Journal of Business, Communication & Technology, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.56632/bct.2023.2102
  • Ham, S. H., & Nguyen, M. T. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching in language education: A review of existing literature. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.548
  • Haun, D. B. M., Rapold, C. J., Janzen, G., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Plasticity of human spatial cognition: Spatial language and cognition across cultures. Cognition, 178, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.010
  • Holmes, P., & O’Neill, G. (2019). Intercultural communication in the global workplace. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(3), 432-457.
  • Ishii, S. (2018). High-context and low-context communication patterns: Towards an understanding of Chinese interpersonal communication. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11(3), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2018.1455758
  • King, J., & Mackey, A. (2018). The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the US labor market. Multilingual Matters.
  • Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (2019). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kramsch, C. (2018). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.
  • Kramsch, C. (2018). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2020). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Equinox Publishing Ltd.
  • Liu, D. (2021). Culturally responsive language teaching: Classroom applications for a globalized world. Routledge.
  • Lucy, J. A. (2001). Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 13486–13490. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03042-4
  • Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nguyen, H. T., & Blum, S. D. (2020). Digital communication and cultural identity in Asia. Journal of Asian Studies, 79(1), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911820000075
  • Ponsonnet, M. (2022). Approaches to language and culture (Handbook). Pages 307–335. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726626ï
  • Sepora, T., Mahadi, T., & Jafari, S. M. (2012). Language and culture. In International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(17). http://www.ijhssnet.com
  • Shinde, B. R., Chikhalikar, R. S., & Professor, A. (2016). Effective communication: A key to enhance the educational productivity.
  • Thomas, D. C., & Peterson, M. F. (2021). Cross-cultural management: Essential concepts. Sage Publications.
  • Thorne, S. L., & Reinhardt, J. (2018). Language learning and teaching in the digital age. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.455
  • Uskul, A. K., & Kikutani, M. (2019). Cultural influences on communicating feelings and intentions in social interactions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118814042
  • Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2020). The origins of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419881151
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. M.E. Sharpe.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
  • Zheng, D., & Zhan, J. (2020). Virtual reality and augmented reality in the language classroom: Practical ideas. Teaching English with Technology, 20(3), 57-73.

Published:

June 27, 2024

DOI:

Issued:

Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 76 – 103, 27.06.2024

Editor:

Citation:

Fenuku, S. D. (2024). Language, Culture, and Mentality: The Three-Dimensional Axis of Language Studies and Effective Communication. Uluslararası Dil Ve Çeviri Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 76-103.
Translate »